Exploring A Vast New Continent of Legislative Possibilities.

We've always seen Congress as the place where America's elected representatives engage in bloodless war over their oft times mutually exclusive, polar opposite, political/ideological (PI) differences, i.e., liberal legislative [solutions, policies] vs. conservative legislative [S, P].

But, with PKQ-controlled Congresses, our legislators would have a new, radically different task: first, look at America's major EFFS problems through an apolitical/non-ideological (ANI) lens. 

Instead of Congress' PKQ-caliber Ds and Rs forging compromises half way between their two parties' stated positions, logic (and wisdom) suggests that they would start with a blank piece of paper (figuratively speaking), then draw upon the best:

• ideas from the last several thousand years of recorded history,
• idea suggestions from the vast mainstream (VM) of the American people—including, and especially, America's tens of millions of 6th-12th graders.

The normative idea is to get tens of millions of eyes looking at our nation's myriad of EFFS problems from tens of millions of different perspectives, not just from two, i.e.,  liberal/democratic vs. conservative/republican. 

re the Survival Of The Fittest Graphic:

LAYMAN'S VIEW: Clearly, a significant slice of the general public will also want to offer policy solution ideas. The same winnowing process app used by schools could be used to arrive at the best ideas. 

The obvious objective of the nation-wide battle of policy ideas is to come up with a wide range of policy solutions that a substantial majority of the VM of society could wholeheartedly support, not least because they were either actively or passively involved in the process from the very beginning.

There is also a  non-overt objective: both inculcate and enculturate into society writ large—including, and especially, America's tens of millions of 6th-12th graders—a hands-on attitude re the process by which a free society arrives at the best possible policy solutions to their nation's myriad of EFFS problems; reinforcing the fact/philosophy that in a neartopic democracy, and in a normative democracy, there is no sharp line (or imposing wall) between the people and their government.

**********

The following graphic is a modified version from the home page. The graphic that follows it is an expanded version of a graphic also on the home page.

re the following "Adapt or perish" graphic: 

It is impossible to overstate how quickly our society will adapt, or adjust to—and be both cognitively and psychoemotionally transformed—when a critical mass of our society have a working knowledge of the many new concepts presented on this website. 

Most notably, almost overnight a critical mass of America’s liberal- and conservative intellectual thought leaders will go FROM what they’ve been thinking and doing for generations, even centuries: thinking liberal vs. conservative thoughts and blaming the “other” side’s policies, values, agenda, members of Congress, etc.—while extolling the virtues of their own side’s policies, values, etc.—TO exploring, and opining on, the radically new concept of normative: policies, values, agendas, PKQ-caliber legislators, etc.

Much of their intellectual firepower will be focused on conceptualizing/designing the logistical infrastructure for a new OFF GRID/ON GRID economic model, a model that, layman's takeaway, in addition to providing the means by which many tens of millions of low income families can achieve a middle class standard of living—AND state of mind—will significantly increase America's net economic activity.